๐Ÿƒ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์žฌํ™œ ์ตœ์‹  ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์š”์•ฝ โ€” 2026๋…„ 04์›” 25์ผ

์ž‘์„ฑ์ž jiwoo kwan (Research Curator)ยท
#์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ์žฌํ™œ#๊ทผ๊ฑฐ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ํ•™#pubmed#๋…ผ๋ฌธ์š”์•ฝ#๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ์žฌํ™œ#์—‰๋ฉ๊ด€์ ˆ#๋ณดํ–‰ํšŒ๋ณต#์ผ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ

๐Ÿƒ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์žฌํ™œ ์ตœ์‹  ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 4ํŽธ ์š”์•ฝ

์ถœ์ฒ˜: PubMed / NCBI ยท ๋‚ ์งœ: 2026๋…„ 04์›” 25์ผ
๊ฒ€์ƒ‰์–ด: hip rehabilitation hip arthroplasty functional outcomes daily activities

๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์žฌํ™œ ๊ด€๋ จ ์ตœ์‹  ์ž„์ƒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํšŒ๋ณต๊ณผ ์žฌํ™œ์— ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ฐ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ DOI ๋˜๋Š” PubMed ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์„ธ์š”.


๐Ÿ“Š ๋…ผ๋ฌธ ํ•œ๋ˆˆ์— ๋น„๊ต

#์ œ๋ชฉ์ œ1์ €์ž์ €๋„์—ฐ๋„๋งํฌ
1Incorporating Functional Strength Integration Techniques During Totalโ€ฆJudd Dana L ์™ธPhysical therapy2024DOI
2Effects of rehabilitation therapy based on exercise prescription on mโ€ฆChe Yan-Jun ์™ธBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023DOI
3Strategies for the prevention of knee osteoarthritis.Roos Ewa M ์™ธNature reviews. Rheumatology2016DOI
4Effect of Otago exercise programme on limb function recovery in elderโ€ฆXiao Meihui ์™ธZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yiโ€ฆ2022DOI

[1] Incorporating Functional Strength Integration Techniques During Total Hip Arthroplasty Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

์ €์ž: Judd Dana L, Cheuy Victor, Peters Amy, Graber Jeremy, Hinrichs-Kinney Lauren et al.
์ €๋„: Physical therapy 104(3), 2024
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad168
PubMed: 38102757

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ œ๋ชฉ: ์ธ๊ณต๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ „์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ (Total Hip Arthroplasty, THA) ์žฌํ™œ ๊ณผ์ •์—์„œ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๊ทผ๋ ฅ ํ†ตํ•ฉ(Functional Strength Integration, FSI) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ• ์ ์šฉ: ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋Œ€์กฐ ์‹œํ—˜

๋ชฉ์ 
์ธ๊ณต๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ „์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ (Total Hip Arthropl, THA)์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฐฑ๋งŒ ๋ช…์˜ ํ†ต์ฆ์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•ด ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ์  ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ THA ์ดํ›„์—๋„ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ณด์ƒ ์ž‘์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ •๋˜๋Š” ์‹ ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ €ํ•˜๊ฐ€ ์ง€์†์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ €ํ•˜๋Š” ๋งŽ์€ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ๊ณผ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์— ๋ถ€์ •์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๊ทผ๋ ฅ ํ†ตํ•ฉ(Functional Strength Integration, FSI) ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์€ ๊ทผ๋ ฅ ๊ฐ•ํ™” ํ›ˆ๋ จ๊ณผ ํŠน์ • ๋™์ž‘ ์žฌํ›ˆ๋ จ์„ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” THA ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ FSI๊ฐ€ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ณด์ƒ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ต์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”์ง€ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•
์ด์ค‘๋งน๊ฒ€ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋Œ€์กฐ ์‹œํ—˜์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด 95๋ช…์˜ ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋ฅผ FSI ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ(CON) ๊ทธ๋ฃน์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋ฐฐ์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ 8์ฃผ๊ฐ„ ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. FSI ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์€ ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ์ค‘ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๋ณด์ƒ ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ฃผ๋ณ€์˜ ๊ทผ์œก ์กฐ์ ˆ ๋ฐ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์šด๋™์„ ํฌํ•จํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. CON ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์€ ์ €๊ฐ•๋„ ์ €ํ•ญ ์šด๋™, ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ฐ€๋™ ๋ฒ”์œ„ ํ™œ๋™, ํ™˜์ž ๊ต์œก์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ, ๊ทผ๋ ฅ, ํ™˜์ž ๋ณด๊ณ  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ(self-reported outcomes)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „, ์ค‘์žฌ ์ค‘๊ฐ„ ๋ฐ ์ข…๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์ , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  THA 6๊ฐœ์›” ํ›„์— ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๋น„ ๊ฐ ์‹œ์ ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ‰๊ฐ€์—์„œ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋ฏธํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. 1์ฐจ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ง€ํ‘œ๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ดํ›„์˜ ํ‰๊ฐ€์—์„œ๋„ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋Š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ชจ๋‘ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋™์•ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๋ก 
FSI ์ค‘์žฌ๋Š” CON ์ค‘์žฌ์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ THA ์ดํ›„ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋” ํฐ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ƒ์ฒด์—ญํ•™์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, FSI ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์˜ ์ ์šฉ ์‹œ๊ธฐ, ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ์šด๋™๋Ÿ‰, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  FSI ์„ฑ๊ณต์„ ์˜ˆ์ธกํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํ™˜์ž ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์‹ฌ๋„ ์žˆ๋Š” ์กฐ์‚ฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์˜ํ–ฅ
THA ์ดํ›„์˜ ํšŒ๋ณต ๊ณผ์ •์€ ๋ณต์žกํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์€ ์ดํ™˜์œจ๊ณผ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์ง€์†์ ์ธ ์›€์ง์ž„ ๊ฒฐํ•จ ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ฒช์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” THA ์žฌํ™œ์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ ‘๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์‹ ๋ชจ๋‘ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ฒด๊ณ„์ ์ธ ์žฌํ™œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ด THA ํ™˜์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋„์›€์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Oxford University Press๊ฐ€ ๋ฏธ๊ตญ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์น˜๋ฃŒํ˜‘ํšŒ(American Physical Therapy Association)๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์‹ ํ•˜์—ฌ 2023๋…„ ๋ฐœํ–‰ํ•จ.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

OBJECTIVE

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common orthopedic procedure that alleviates pain for millions of individuals. Yet, persistent physical function deficits, perhaps associated with movement compensations, are observed after THA. These deficits negatively affect quality of life and health for many individuals. Functional strength integration (FSI) techniques combine muscle strength training with specific movement retraining to improve physical function. This study aimed to determine if FSI would improve functional performance through remediation of movement compensations for individuals after THA.

METHODS

A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted. Ninety-five participants were randomized to either the FSI or control (CON) group for an 8-week intervention. The FSI protocol included exercise to improve muscular control and stability around the hip to minimize movement compensation during daily activity. The CON protocol included low-load resistance exercise, range-of-motion activities, and patient education. Functional performance, muscle strength, and self-reported outcomes were measured preoperatively, midway and after intervention, and 6ย months after THA. Change from preoperative assessment to each time point was measured, and between-group differences were assessed.

RESULTS

There were minimal differences in outcomes between groups at the first postoperative assessment. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the later assessments, including the primary endpoint. Both groups improved functional outcomes throughout the study period.

CONCLUSION

The FSI intervention did not result in greater improvements in function after THA compared to the CON intervention. Future work should further investigate additional biomechanical outcomes, timing of the FSI protocol, effective dosing, and patient characteristics predictive of success with FSI.

IMPACT

Recovery after THA is complex, and individuals after THA are affected by persistent movement deficits that affect morbidity and quality of life. The present study suggests that either approach to THA rehabilitation could improve outcomes for patients, and that structured rehabilitation programs may benefit individuals after THA.

Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Physical Therapy Association 2023.


[2] Effects of rehabilitation therapy based on exercise prescription on motor function and complications after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients.

์ €์ž: Che Yan-Jun, Qian Zongna, Chen Qi, Chang Rui, Xie Xiaofeng et al.
์ €๋„: BMC musculoskeletal disorders 24(1), 2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06806-y
PubMed: 37838680

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ œ๋ชฉ: ๊ณ ๋ น ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์šด๋™ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์žฌํ™œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ
์šด๋™ ์žฌํ™œ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์€ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ(hip fracture) ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์˜ˆํ›„๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ˆ˜๋‹จ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ํŠน์ • ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ด๋‚˜ ์šด๋™ ์š”๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ์œจ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ์ „ํžˆ ๋…ผ๋ž€์ด ์žˆ๋‹ค.

๋ชฉ์ 
๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ณ ๋ น ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์™€ ์šด๋™ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ(exercise prescription)์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์žฌํ™œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ณ‘ํ–‰ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ์˜ ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•
๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 2020๋…„ 10์›”๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2021๋…„ 12์›”๊นŒ์ง€ ์‘ค์ €์šฐ ์‹œ๋ฆฝ๋ณ‘์›(Suzhou Municipal Hospital)์—์„œ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ (hip arthroplasty) ๋ฐ ๊ทผ์œ„ ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ณจ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜๊ฐ• ๋‚ด ์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ (internal fixation of the proximal femur with an intramedullary nail)์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ณ ๋ น ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ํ™˜์ž ์ด 71๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ 11๋ช…(์ถ”์  ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์†Œ์‹ค 8๋ช…, ํƒ€ ์›์ธ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ง 2๋ช…, ๊ธฐํƒ€ ์‚ฌ์œ  1๋ช…)์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•œ ์ด 60๋ช…(๋‚จ์„ฑ 18๋ช…, ์—ฌ์„ฑ 42๋ช…)์„ ์ตœ์ข… ๋ถ„์„์— ํฌํ•จํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์€ ๋‚œ์ˆ˜ ์ƒ์„ฑ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ(n=30)๊ณผ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ(n=30)์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋ฐฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ์šด๋™ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ ์›์น™์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์žฌํ™œ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ‡ด์› ์‹œ์ ๊ณผ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ 1, 3, 6๊ฐœ์›” ์‹œ์ ์— ์šด๋™ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ(ํ•ด๋ฆฌ์Šค ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ ์ˆ˜, Harris hip score), ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ(๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜, Barthel Index), ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์—ฌ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋กํ•˜์—ฌ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
์–‘์ชฝ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ 1, 3, 6๊ฐœ์›” ์‹œ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๋ฆฌ์Šค ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ํ‡ด์› ์‹œ์ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05). ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์€ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‡ด์› ์‹œ์  ๋ฐ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ 1, 3, 6๊ฐœ์›” ์‹œ์ ์˜ ํ•ด๋ฆฌ์Šค ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ ์ˆ˜์™€ ๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05). ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ 6๊ฐœ์›” ์‹œ์ ์˜ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋ฅ ์€ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์ด 13%๋กœ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์˜ 37%๋ณด๋‹ค ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๋ก 
์šด๋™ ์ฒ˜๋ฐฉ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์žฌํ™œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋Š” ๊ณ ๋ น ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๊ณผ ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋„์›€์ด ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ž„์ƒ ํ˜„์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ์˜์‚ฌ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ง€์นจ์ด ๋  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ณ ๋ น ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ž„์ƒ ๊ด€๋ฆฌ ์ฒด๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

BACKGROUND

Exercise rehabilitation training is an important measure for improving the prognosis of patients with hip fractures. However, the particular program that works effectively and the efficiency of exercise therapy are still controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of usual postoperative care combined with rehabilitation based on exercise prescription on motor function and complications in elderly patients who underwent surgery for hip fracture.

METHODS

This was an observational study. A total of 71 elderly patients with hip fractures who were treated with hip arthroplasty and internal fixation of the proximal femur with an intramedullary nail at Suzhou Municipal Hospital from October 2020 to December 2021 were included; 11 cases were excluded (eight cases were excluded due to loss of follow-up, two due to deaths from other causes, and one due to other reasons). Finally, 60 patients (18 males and 42 females) were included. Patients were randomly assigned to the control (nโ€‰=โ€‰30) and experimental (nโ€‰=โ€‰30) groups using a random number generator. Patients in the control group received usual postoperative care, whereas those in the experimental group received usual postoperative care combined with rehabilitation training based on the principles of exercise prescription. We recorded the motor function (Harris hip score), daily living ability (Barthel Index), and complications at discharge and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The Harris hip score and Barthel Index score were significantly higher at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively than at discharge in both groups (pโ€‰<โ€‰0.05). The Harris hip score and Barthel Index score at discharge and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (pโ€‰<โ€‰0.05). The incidence of complications at 6 months postoperatively was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (13% vs. 37%).

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation therapy based on exercise prescription helps improve hip function and the ability to perform activities of daily living and related postoperative complications after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. The findings of our study will guide decision-making in clinical practice and improve the clinical management of hip fractures in elderly patients postoperatively.

ยฉ 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.


[3] Strategies for the prevention of knee osteoarthritis.

์ €์ž: Roos Ewa M, Arden Nigel K
์ €๋„: Nature reviews. Rheumatology 12(2), 2016
DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.135
PubMed: 26439406

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ
๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ(Osteoarthritis, OA)์€ ๊ทธ๋™์•ˆ ์—ฐ๊ณจ ์งˆํ™˜์œผ๋กœ ์—ฌ๊ฒจ์ ธ ์™”์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ค‘์ฆ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ด€์ ˆ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ (joint arthroplasty)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์น˜๋ฃŒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜ค๋Š˜๋‚  ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์€ ์กฐ๊ธฐ ๋‹จ๊ณ„์—์„œ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ๊ณผ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ ์ „์‹  ๊ด€์ ˆ ์งˆํ™˜(whole-organ disease)์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ„์ฃผ๋ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์€ 10~15๋…„์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ์„œ์„œํžˆ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜๋ฉฐ ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ๊ณผ ์—…๋ฌด ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ์„ ์ €ํ•ดํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งŽ์€ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ํ†ต์ฆ์„ ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๊ฒฌ๋””๋ฉฐ, ๋‹ค์ˆ˜์˜ ์˜๋ฃŒ์ง„ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ†ต์ฆ๊ณผ ์žฅ์• ๋ฅผ ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ๋ฐ ๋…ธํ™”์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๋ถˆ๊ฐ€ํ”ผํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋ฐ›์•„๋“ค์ด๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜๋ฃŒ์ง„์ด ๋ฌด๋ฆŽ ๋ฐ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•œ '๊ด€์ ˆ์˜ ์ข…๋ง'์„ ์ˆ˜๋™์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋„ˆ๋ฌด ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์‹  ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋งŒ์„ฑ ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ๊ณผ ์กฐ๊ธฐ ํฌ๊ด„์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๋ชจ๋ธ์ด ํ‘œ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ์ž๋ฆฌ ์žก์•„์•ผ ํ•˜๋Š” ๋งŒ์„ฑ ์งˆํ™˜์œผ๋กœ ์ธ์‹๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋ฐ ์ „๋žต
๊ด€์ ˆ ์†์ƒ, ๋น„๋งŒ, ๊ทผ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ €ํ•˜(impaired muscle function)๋Š” ์ผ์ฐจ ๋ฐ ์ด์ฐจ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ ์ „๋žต์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์œ„ํ—˜ ์š”์ธ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ์œ„ํ—˜ ์š”์ธ์„ ๊ต์ •ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ ํ™˜์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์ „๋žต์„ ์ฐพ์•„์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์š”๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ˆœ์‘๋„(adherence)์™€ ์ง€์†์„ฑ(persistence)์„ ๊ทน๋Œ€ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ์ˆ˜์šฉํ•  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋†’์€ ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฒ•์„ ์„ ํƒํ•ด์•ผ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด์ œ๋Š” ๋ฌด๋ฆŽ ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ์ธ ๋งž์ถคํ˜• ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ ์‹œ๋Œ€๋ฅผ ์—ด์–ด์•ผ ํ•  ๋•Œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

Osteoarthritis (OA) has been thought of as a disease of cartilage that can be effectively treated surgically at severe stages with joint arthroplasty. Today, OA is considered a whole-organ disease that is amenable to prevention and treatment at early stages. OA develops slowly over 10-15 years, interfering with activities of daily living and the ability to work. Many patients tolerate pain, and many health-care providers accept pain and disability as inevitable corollaries of OA and ageing. Too often, health-care providers passively await final 'joint death', necessitating knee and hip replacements. Instead, OA should be viewed as a chronic condition, where prevention and early comprehensive-care models are the accepted norm, as is the case with other chronic diseases. Joint injury, obesity and impaired muscle function are modifiable risk factors amenable to primary and secondary prevention strategies. The strategies that are most appropriate for each patient should be identified, by selecting interventions to correct--or at least attenuate--OA risk factors. We must also choose the interventions that are most likely to be acceptable to patients, to maximize adherence to--and persistence with--the regimes. Now is the time to begin the era of personalized prevention for knee OA.


[4] Effect of Otago exercise programme on limb function recovery in elderly patients with hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture.

์ €์ž: Xiao Meihui, Wang Qin, Liu Tang, Ma Caili, Yang Li et al.
์ €๋„: Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences 47(9), 2022
DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.220307
PubMed: 36411708

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋ชฉ์ 

๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ (hip arthroplasty)์€ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ๋ฐ ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ณจ๋‘ ๊ดด์‚ฌ(necrosis in the femoral head) ์น˜๋ฃŒ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์‚ฌ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํšŒ๋ณต์€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ค€์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์žฌํ™œ ์šด๋™์€ ์‚ฌ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํšŒ๋ณต์— ๊ฒฐ์ •์ ์ธ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์˜คํƒ€๊ณ  ์šด๋™ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ(Otago exercise programme, OEP)์€ ๋‚™์ƒ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ, ์‚ฌ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ๋ฐ ๋ณดํ–‰ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ํ–ฅ์ƒ, ํ•˜์ง€ ๊ทผ๋ ฅ ๊ฐ•ํ™”์— ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ์ž…์ฆ๋œ ์•ˆ์ „ํ•˜๊ณ  ์‹ค์šฉ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ ์ธ ์žฌํ™œ ์šด๋™์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ฒฝ๋ถ€ ๊ณจ์ ˆ(femoral neck fracture)๋กœ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ณ ๋ น ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์‚ฌ์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์žฌํ™œ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” OEP์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•

์„ ์ • ๋ฐ ์ œ์™ธ ๊ธฐ์ค€์„ ์ถฉ์กฑํ•˜๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ฒฝ๋ถ€ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ  ํ™˜์ž ์ด 77๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์€ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„๋กœ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ(n=39)๊ณผ ์ค‘์žฌ๊ตฐ(n=38)์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ํ†ต์ƒ์ ์ธ ์žฌํ™œ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ์ค‘์žฌ๊ตฐ์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ํ†ต์ƒ์ ์ธ ์žฌํ™œ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์— ๋”ํ•ด OEP๋ฅผ ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ค‘์žฌ ์ „, ํ‡ด์› ์‹œ, ํ‡ด์› ํ›„ 12์ฃผ ์‹œ์ ์— ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜ ๊ฑท๊ธฐ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ(Time get up and go test, TGUT), 5ํšŒ ์•‰์•˜๋‹ค ์ผ์–ด๋‚˜๊ธฐ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ(five times sit to stand test, FTSST), 10๋ฏธํ„ฐ ๋ณดํ–‰ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ(10-meter walking test, 10MWT), ํ•ด๋ฆฌ์Šค ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์ ์ˆ˜(Harris Hip Score, HHS), ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ์ฒ™๋„(๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜, Barthel index), ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ ์„ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์‚ฌ(SF-36)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ

์ค‘์žฌ ์ „, ๋‘ ์ง‘๋‹จ ๊ฐ„ TGUT, FTSST, 10MWT, HHS, ๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜, SF-36 ์ ์ˆ˜์—๋Š” ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(๋ชจ๋‘ P > 0.05). ์ค‘์žฌ ํ›„ ํ‡ด์› ์‹œ์ ์—๋Š” TGUT์—์„œ ๋‘ ์ง‘๋‹จ ๊ฐ„ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜(P > 0.05), FTSST์™€ 10MWT๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์ด ์ค‘์žฌ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋” ๊ธด ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์†Œ์š”๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ (๋ชจ๋‘ P < 0.05), HHS, ๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜, SF-36 ์ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์ด ์ค‘์žฌ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(P < 0.05). ํ‡ด์› ํ›„ 12์ฃผ ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ๋Š” TGUT, FTSST, 10MWT, HHS, ๋ฐ”๋ธ ์ง€์ˆ˜, SF-36 ์ ์ˆ˜ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ค‘์žฌ๊ตฐ์ด ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(P < 0.05).

๊ฒฐ๋ก 

OEP๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ฒฝ๋ถ€ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋กœ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์น˜ํ™˜์ˆ ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ณ ๋ น ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์‚ฌ์ง€ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ๊ณผ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํšŒ๋ณต์„ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•˜๊ณ , ์ผ์ƒ์ ์ธ ์ด๋™ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ๊ณผ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์–ด ์ž„์ƒ ์ ์šฉ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

OBJECTIVES

Hip arthroplasty is the most important surgical method for the treatment of hip fractures and necrosis in the femoral head. Limb function recovery is an important criterion to reflect the efficacy of surgery and the quality for life of patients. Postoperative rehabilitation exercises are crucial for limb function recovery. Otago exercise programme (OEP) is a safe, effective, practical, and economical rehabilitation exercise, which has been proven to prevent falls, improve limb function and walking ability, and lower limb strength. This study aims to explore the effect of OEP on limb function rehabilitation in elderly patients with hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

A total of 77 elderly patients with hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures who met the criteria for inclusion and exclusion were enrolled for this study. They were randomly divided into a control group ( n =39) and an intervention group ( n =38). The control group was given routine rehabilitation training, and the intervention group performed OEP on the basis of the control group. Time get up and go test (TGUT), five times sit to stand test (FTSST), 10-meter walking test (10MWT), Harris Hip Score (HHS), Daily Activity Scale (Barthel index), and the Mos 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used before the intervention, at discharge, and the 12th week after discharge.

RESULTS

Before the intervention, there were no differences in TGUT, FTSST, 10MWT, HHS score, Barthel index, and SF-36 score between the 2 groups (all P >0.05). At the discharge after the intervention, there was no difference in TGUT between the 2 groups ( P >0.05), but the FTSST and 10MWT in the control group were longer than those in the intervention group (both P <0.05), and the HHS score, Barthel index, and SF-36 score in the control group were lower than those in the intervention group ( P <0.05). At the 12th week after discharge, TGUT, FTSST, 10MWT, HHS score, Barthel index, and SF-36 score in the intervention group were better than those in the control group ( P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

OEP can effectively promote limb stability and hip function recovery in elderly patients with hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures, improve daily mobility and quality of life, and it is suitable for clinical application.



๐Ÿ“š ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ (References)

  1. Judd Dana L, Cheuy Victor, Peters Amy, Graber Jeremy, Hinrichs-Kinney Lauren et al.. Incorporating Functional Strength Integration Techniques During Total Hip Arthroplasty Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Physical therapy 104(3), 2024. ยท DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad168 ยท PubMed: 38102757
  2. Che Yan-Jun, Qian Zongna, Chen Qi, Chang Rui, Xie Xiaofeng et al.. Effects of rehabilitation therapy based on exercise prescription on motor function and complications after hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. BMC musculoskeletal disorders 24(1), 2023. ยท DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06806-y ยท PubMed: 37838680
  3. Roos Ewa M, Arden Nigel K. Strategies for the prevention of knee osteoarthritis. Nature reviews. Rheumatology 12(2), 2016. ยท DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.135 ยท PubMed: 26439406
  4. Xiao Meihui, Wang Qin, Liu Tang, Ma Caili, Yang Li et al.. Effect of Otago exercise programme on limb function recovery in elderly patients with hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences 47(9), 2022. ยท DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.220307 ยท PubMed: 36411708
๋ณธ ํฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” PubMed ๊ณต๊ฐœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ž๋™ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž„์ƒ ์ ์šฉ ์ „ ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ์›๋ฌธ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์™€ ์ƒ๋‹ดํ•˜์„ธ์š”.

์ถœ์ฒ˜