๐Ÿ‘ด ๋…ธ์ธ ์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ ์žฌํ™œ ๋ฆฌ์„œ์น˜ ์Šค๋ƒ…์ƒท โ€” 2026๋…„ 04์›” 25์ผ

่‘—่€… jiwoo kwan (Research Curator)ยท
#์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ์žฌํ™œ#๊ทผ๊ฑฐ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ํ•™#pubmed#๋…ผ๋ฌธ์š”์•ฝ#๋…ธ์ธ์žฌํ™œ#์ด๋™๋Šฅ๋ ฅ#๋…๋ฆฝ์ƒํ™œ#์‚ถ์˜์งˆ

๐Ÿ‘ด ๋…ธ์ธ ์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ ์žฌํ™œ ์ตœ์‹  ๋…ผ๋ฌธ 3ํŽธ ์š”์•ฝ

์ถœ์ฒ˜: PubMed / NCBI ยท ๋‚ ์งœ: 2026๋…„ 04์›” 25์ผ
๊ฒ€์ƒ‰์–ด: geriatric orthopedic rehabilitation mobility independence quality of life

๋…ธ์ธ ์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ ์žฌํ™œ ๊ด€๋ จ ์ตœ์‹  ์ž„์ƒ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ •๋ฆฌํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ํšŒ๋ณต๊ณผ ์žฌํ™œ์— ์‹ค์งˆ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์›€์ด ๋˜๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ ์ค‘์‹ฌ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.
์ž์„ธํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ๊ฐ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ DOI ๋˜๋Š” PubMed ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์„ธ์š”.


๐Ÿ“Š ๋…ผ๋ฌธ ํ•œ๋ˆˆ์— ๋น„๊ต

#์ œ๋ชฉ์ œ1์ €์ž์ €๋„์—ฐ๋„๋งํฌ
1How balance task-specific training contributes to improving physicalโ€ฆMonticone Marco ์™ธClinical rehabilitation2018DOI
2COMPLEX MANAGEMENT OF FRAILTY FRACTURES--CASE REPORT.Costescu Elena Puin ์™ธRevista medico-chirurgicala aโ€ฆ2016PubMed
3Tibiotalar Nailing for Geriatric Pilon Fractures: Case Report and Revโ€ฆSayed Bassel El ์™ธJournal of orthopaedic case rโ€ฆ2025DOI

[1] How balance task-specific training contributes to improving physical function in older subjects undergoing rehabilitation following hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial.

์ €์ž: Monticone Marco, Ambrosini Emilia, Brunati Roberto, Capone Antonio, Pagliari Giulia et al.
์ €๋„: Clinical rehabilitation 32(3), 2018
DOI: 10.1177/0269215517724851
PubMed: 28805094

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋ชฉ์ 
๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ(hip fracture) ํ›„ ์žฌํ™œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›๋Š” ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ท ํ˜• ๊ณผ์ œ ํŠน์ด์  ํ›ˆ๋ จ(balance task-specific training)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์žฌํ™œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์ด ์‹ ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ, ํ†ต์ฆ, ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋Šฅ๋ ฅ(Activities of Daily Living, ADL), ๊ท ํ˜• ๋ฐ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•œ๋‹ค.

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ์„ค๊ณ„
๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋Œ€์กฐ ์‹œํ—˜(Randomized controlled trial).

์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋Œ€์ƒ
๊ด€์ ˆ๋‚ญ ์™ธ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ(extra-capsular hip fracture)๋กœ ๋‚ด๊ณ ์ •์ˆ (internal fixation)์„ ๋ฐ›์€ 52๋ช…์˜ ๊ณ ๋ น ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ(n=26)๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ(n=26)์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌด์ž‘์œ„ ๋ฐฐ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

์ค‘์žฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•
์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์€ ๊ท ํ˜• ๊ณผ์ œ ํŠน์ด์  ํ›ˆ๋ จ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์žฌํ™œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์€ ์—ด๋ฆฐ ์‚ฌ์Šฌ ์šด๋™(open kinetic chain exercises)๊ณผ ๋ณดํ–‰ ํ›ˆ๋ จ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ชจ๋‘ 3์ฃผ ๋™์•ˆ ์ฃผ 5ํšŒ, 1ํšŒ๋‹น 90๋ถ„์”ฉ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.

ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ง€ํ‘œ
์›จ์Šคํ„ด ์˜จํƒ€๋ฆฌ์˜ค ๋ฐ ๋งฅ๋งˆ์Šคํ„ฐ ๋Œ€ํ•™ ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ์—ผ ์ง€์ˆ˜(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WOMAC), ํ†ต์ฆ ์ˆซ์ž ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ฒ™๋„(Pain Numerical Rating Scale), ๋ฒ„๊ทธ ๊ท ํ˜• ์ฒ™๋„(Berg Balance Scale), ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋…๋ฆฝ์„ฑ ์ฒ™๋„(Functional Independence Measure) ๋ฐ 36ํ•ญ๋ชฉ ๋‹จ์ถ•ํ˜• ๊ฑด๊ฐ• ์„ค๋ฌธ์กฐ์‚ฌ(36-item Short-Form Health Survey)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฐธ๊ฐ€์ž๋“ค์€ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ์ „ํ›„์™€ 12๊ฐœ์›” ํ›„ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฅผ ๋ฐ›์•˜๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ
๋ชจ๋“  ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ง€ํ‘œ์—์„œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„, ๊ทธ๋ฃน, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ณผ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์˜ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ํšจ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๋” ๊ธ์ •์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์ผ์ฐจ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ์ง€ํ‘œ์ธ WOMAC ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ ์ ์ˆ˜์—์„œ ํ›ˆ๋ จ ์งํ›„์™€ ์ถ”์  ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์‹œ์ ์— ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๊ฐ„ 25์ ์˜ ์ž„์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ํ™•์ธ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค(์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์ „, ์น˜๋ฃŒ ํ›„, ์ถ”์  ๊ด€์ฐฐ ์‹œ WOMAC ์ ์ˆ˜๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ 84.8(3.7), 39.8(4.9), 35.7(6.2)์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์€ 80.9(5.7), 65.2(7.1), 61.0(11.1)์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค).

๊ฒฐ๋ก 
๊ท ํ˜• ๊ณผ์ œ ํŠน์ด์  ํ›ˆ๋ จ์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์ž…์› ์žฌํ™œ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ํ›„ ๊ณ ๋ น ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์‹ ์ฒด ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ, ํ†ต์ฆ, ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๋ฐ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์„ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋‹ค.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of a rehabilitation programme including balance task-specific training in improving physical function, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), balance and quality of life in subjects after a hip fracture.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SUBJECTS

A total of 52 older subjects selected for internal fixation due to extra-capsular hip fracture were randomized to be included in an experimental ( n = 26) and control group ( n = 26).

INTERVENTIONS

The experimental group underwent a rehabilitation programme based on balance task-specific training. The control group underwent general physiotherapy, including open kinetic chain exercises and walking training. Both groups individually followed programmes of 90-minute sessions five times/week for three weeks.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), a Pain Numerical Rating Scale, the Berg Balance Scale, the Functional Independence Measure and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. The participants were evaluated before and after training, and after 12 months.

RESULTS

Significant effects of time, group and time ร— group were found for all outcome measures in favour of the experimental group. A clinically important between-group difference of 25 points was achieved after training and at follow-up in terms of the primary outcome (WOMAC function before treatment, after treatment and at follow-up was 84.8 (3.7), 39.8 (4.9) and 35.7 (6.2) for the experimental group and 80.9 (5.7), 65.2 (7.1) and 61.0 (11.1) for the control group).

CONCLUSION

An inpatient rehabilitation programme based on balance task-specific training is useful in improving physical function, pain, ADL and quality of life in older patients after hip fracture.


[2] COMPLEX MANAGEMENT OF FRAILTY FRACTURES--CASE REPORT.

์ €์ž: Costescu Elena Puin, Dronic Aliona, Alexa Loana Dana, Alexa O
์ €๋„: Revista medico-chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi 120(1), 2016
PubMed: 27125080

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ: ๋…ธ์ธ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ(frailty fractures)์€ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ(osteoporosis)์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•œ ์—ฌ์„ฑ์—๊ฒŒ์„œ ๋” ํ”ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ณจ๋ฐ˜ํ™˜ ๊ณจ์ ˆ(pelvic ring fractures)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ‰๊ท  ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ ์ˆ˜๋ช…์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ๋ฅ ๋„ ๋†’์•„์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฒฝ๋ฏธํ•œ ์†์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ธฐ์–ตํ•˜์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž„์ƒ์  ์ง•ํ›„์™€ ์ฆ์ƒ, ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์  ๋ณ€ํ™”, ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์•ˆ์ •์„ฑ ์ •๋„๋Š” ๋งค์šฐ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์„ ํƒ์˜ ํญ์ด ๋„“์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์˜์‚ฌ์—๊ฒŒ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ์ • ์ค‘ ํ•˜๋‚˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ์™€ ๋ณด์กด์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์‚ฌ์ด์—์„œ ์„ ํƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ๋ณธ ์ฆ๋ก€์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ฌํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ์งˆํ™˜(cardiovascular disease)๊ณผ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ๋ณ‘๋ ฅ์ด ์žˆ๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ ๊ณจ๋ฐ˜ํ™˜ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ๊ณ ๋ น ์—ฌ์„ฑ ํ™˜์ž๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ •ํ˜•์™ธ๊ณผ ๊ฒ€์ง„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ณด์กด์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ฐ€ ๊ถŒ๊ณ ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, "Dr. C.I. Parhon" ๋ณ‘์› ๋…ธ์ธ๋ณ‘ ํด๋ฆฌ๋‹‰(Geriatric Clinic)์—์„œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒ ์ €ํ•œ ์‹ ์ฒด ๊ฒ€์ง„๊ณผ ๋…ธ์ธ ํฌ๊ด„ ํ‰๊ฐ€(geriatric evaluation)๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ํšŒ๋ณต, ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์˜์–‘ ๊ณต๊ธ‰, ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์  ์ง€์›, ์‹ฌํ˜ˆ๊ด€ ๋™๋ฐ˜ ์งˆํ™˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ, ์žฅ๊ธฐ ์™€์ƒ(extended bed rest)์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ๋ณตํ•ฉ์ ์ธ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๊ณ„ํš์„ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋Š” 60์ผ๊ฐ„ ์ง„ํ–‰๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ธ์ •์ ์ด์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทผ๊ธด์žฅ๋„์™€ ๊ณจ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ(osteoarticular function) ๋ณด์กด์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ณจ ์ทจ์•ฝ์„ฑ ๊ฐ์†Œ, ์˜์–‘์‹ค์กฐ ๊ต์ •, ์šฐ์šธ๊ฐ ๊ฐœ์„  ๋ฐ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ด๋™ ๋Šฅ๋ ฅ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ํšŒ๋ณต ๋“ฑ์˜ ์„ฑ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ๋‘์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋•๋ถ„์— ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ํ˜ผ์ž ๊ฑฐ์ฃผํ•˜๋Š” ์žํƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณต๊ท€ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ์ผ์ƒ์ ์ธ ๊ฐ€์‚ฌ ํ™œ๋™์— ๋„์›€์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ, ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ๊ณผ ๋…๋ฆฝ์„ฑ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ํšŒ๋ณต ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ง€์†ํ•  ๊ณ„ํš์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

Frailty fractures encompass pelvic ring fractures in the elderly--a condition more frequently encountered in women, usually with pre-existing osteoporosis. The incidence of these fractures is increasing, following the increase in average life expectancy. Most of the times, they are the result of a minor injury, of which the patient has little or no recollection; the clinical signs and symptoms, radiological changes and the degree of fracture stability vary greatly. As such, there is a wide range of therapeutic options and one of the most important decisions for the physician is choosing between surgery and conservative treatment. We present the case of an elderly female patient with multiple pelvic ring fractures, and a medical history of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis; the orthopedic examination recommended conservative treatment which was carried out in the Geriatric Clinic of the "Dr. C.I. Parhon" Hospital. Following the complete physical examination and through geriatric evaluation, a complex therapeutic plan was devised, which included: recovery through physiotherapy, adequate nutrition, psychological support, treatment of the cardiovascular comorbidities and prevention of the consequences of extended bed rest. The treatment lasted for 60 days and the outcome was favorable: decreased bone frailty, mainly through preserving muscle tone and osteoarticular function, correction of malnutrition, improvement of depression and partial recovery of patient's mobility; the results of our therapy made it possible for the patient to return home, where she leaves alone. She will need help with daily household chores, but she intends to continue the recovery therapy as means of increasing her quality of life and independence.


[3] Tibiotalar Nailing for Geriatric Pilon Fractures: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

์ €์ž: Sayed Bassel El, Young Porter
์ €๋„: Journal of orthopaedic case reports 15(9), 2025
DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.6046
PubMed: 40936864

#### ์š”์•ฝ (ํ•œ๊ตญ์–ด)

๋…ผ๋ฌธ ์ œ๋ชฉ: ๋…ธ์ธ์„ฑ ํ•„๋ก  ๊ณจ์ ˆ(Pilon fractures)์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ(Tibiotalar) ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ : ์ฆ๋ก€ ๋ณด๊ณ  ๋ฐ ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ณ ์ฐฐ

๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ
๊ฒฝ๊ณจ ํ•„๋ก  ๊ณจ์ ˆ์€ ํŠนํžˆ ๊ธฐ์ € ์งˆํ™˜์ด ์žˆ๊ณ  ์—ฐ๋ถ€ ์กฐ์ง ์ƒํƒœ๊ฐ€ ์ข‹์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋…ธ์ธ ํ™˜์ž์—๊ฒŒ ๋งค์šฐ ๊นŒ๋‹ค๋กœ์šด ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๊ณผ์ œ์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ด€ํ˜ˆ์  ์ •๋ณต ๋ฐ ๋‚ด๊ณ ์ •์ˆ (Open reduction and internal fixation, ORIF)์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ-์ข…๊ณจ(Tibiotalocalcaneal, TTC) ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ „ํ†ต์ ์ธ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฒ•์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ํ”ํžˆ ๊ฐ์—ผ, ๋ถˆ์œ ํ•ฉ(Nonunion), ๋ถ€์ •์œ ํ•ฉ(Malunion) ๋“ฑ์˜ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์„ ๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ์€ ์•ˆ์ •์ ์ธ ๊ณ ์ •์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๊ฑฐ๊ณจํ•˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ(Subtalar joint)์˜ ์›€์ง์ž„์„ ๋ณด์กดํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๋Œ€์•ˆ์  ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฒ•์ด์ง€๋งŒ, ๋…ธ์ธ์„ฑ ํ•„๋ก  ๊ณจ์ ˆ์—์„œ์˜ ํšจ์šฉ์„ฑ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ์€ ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์‹ค์ •์ž…๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ธฐ์ € ์งˆํ™˜์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 64์„ธ ์—ฌ์„ฑ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ ํ•„๋ก  ๊ณจ์ ˆ์„ ์ „๋ฐฉ ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜๊ฐ• ๋‚ด ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ (Antegrade tibiotalar intramedullary nailing)๋กœ ์„ฑ๊ณต์ ์œผ๋กœ ์น˜๋ฃŒํ•œ ์‚ฌ๋ก€๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ด ์ˆ ๊ธฐ์˜ ์ž ์žฌ์  ์ด์ ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์ฆ๋ก€ ๋ณด๊ณ 
๋งŒ์„ฑ ํ์‡„์„ฑ ํ์งˆํ™˜(Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), ๊ณ ํ˜ˆ์•• ๋ฐ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ํก์—ฐ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ 64์„ธ ์—ฌ์„ฑ ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ณ„๋‹จ์—์„œ ๋„˜์–ด์ง„ ํ›„ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ์šฐ์ธก ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ ํ•„๋ก  ๋ฐ ์›์œ„๋ถ€ ๋น„๊ณจ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋กœ ๋‚ด์›ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ € ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ ์ข‹์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์—ฐ๋ถ€ ์กฐ์ง ์ƒํƒœ๋กœ ์ธํ•ด ๊ด€ํ˜ˆ์  ์ •๋ณต ๋ฐ ๋‚ด๊ณ ์ •์ˆ  ์‹œํ–‰ ์‹œ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ๋†’์•˜์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์˜ต์…˜์„ ๋…ผ์˜ํ•œ ๋์—, ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์  ์ดํ™˜์œจ์„ ์ตœ์†Œํ™”ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜๊ฐ• ๋‚ด ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ์„ ์„ ํƒํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์€ ์Šฌ๊ฐœ์ƒ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฒ•(Suprapatellar approach)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ณจ๋Ÿ‰์„ ๋ณด์กดํ•˜๊ณ  ํ–ฅํ›„ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„ ์—ด์–ด๋‘๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด 8mm ๊ธˆ์†์ •์„ ์‚ฝ์ž…ํ•˜์˜€์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ๋Š” ์–‘ํ˜ธํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, 9๊ฐœ์›” ๋งŒ์— ๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ์™„์ „ํžˆ ์น˜์œ ๋˜์—ˆ๊ณ  ํ†ต์ฆ์€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์—†์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋…๋ฆฝ์ ์ธ ์ผ์ƒ์ƒํ™œ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•ด์กŒ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ™˜์ž๋Š” ๊ธˆ์† ์ œ๊ฑฐ์ˆ ์ด๋‚˜ ๋ฐœ๋ชฉ ๊ด€์ ˆ ์œ ํ•ฉ์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ์„ ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋งŒ์กฑ๊ฐ์„ ํ‘œํ–ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ๋ก 
๋ณธ ์ฆ๋ก€๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ € ์งˆํ™˜์ด ์‹ฌ๊ฐํ•œ ๋…ธ์ธ์„ฑ ํ•„๋ก  ๊ณจ์ ˆ ํ™˜์ž ์น˜๋ฃŒ์— ์žˆ์–ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ์ด ๊ด€ํ˜ˆ์  ์ •๋ณต ๋ฐ ๋‚ด๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ์ด๋‚˜ ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ-์ข…๊ณจ ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ์˜ ์œ ํšจํ•œ ๋Œ€์•ˆ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๊ณจํ•˜ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์กดํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ด๋™์„ฑ๊ณผ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์ž ์žฌ์  ์ด์ ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์นจ์Šต์ ์ธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์œ„ํ—˜์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ์ˆ ๊ธฐ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ธฐ์กด ๋ฌธํ—Œ์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•œ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ, ๋ณธ ๋ณด๊ณ ์„œ๋Š” ํ•ด๋‹น ์ˆ ๊ธฐ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์„ ๋’ท๋ฐ›์นจํ•˜๋Š” ๊ทผ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ๋ณด๊ฐ•ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ์—ฌํ•ฉ๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ํ–ฅํ›„ ๋” ํฐ ๊ทœ๋ชจ์˜ ํ™˜์ž๊ตฐ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฒฝ๊ณจ-๊ฑฐ๊ณจ ๊ธˆ์†์ • ๊ณ ์ •์ˆ ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ์กด ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฒ•์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ ์‘์ฆ์„ ๊ตฌ์ฒดํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ตœ์ ํ™”ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

์›๋ฌธ Abstract ๋ณด๊ธฐ

INTRODUCTION

Tibial pilon fractures present a complex challenge, particularly in geriatric patients with comorbidities and compromised soft tissue. Traditional treatment options such as open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing have shown variable outcomes, often complicated by infection, nonunion, and malunion. Tibiotalar nailing is an alternative approach that preserves subtalar joint motion while providing stable fixation, though, there is limited literature on its efficacy in geriatric pilon fractures. This report describes a case of a 64-year-old female with multiple comorbidities presenting with tibial pilon fracture successfully managed with antegrade tibiotalar intramedullary nailing, highlighting the potential advantages of this technique.

CASE REPORT

A 64-year-old female with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and a significant smoking history presented with a right tibial pilon and distal fibula fracture following a fall down the stairs. Due to her medical comorbidities and poor soft tissue envelope, she was at high risk for complications with ORIF. After discussing multiple treatment options, she elected to proceed with a tibiotalar intramedullary nail to optimize function while minimizing surgical morbidity. The procedure was performed using a suprapatellar approach, and an 8mm nail was inserted to preserve bone stock and future surgical options. Postoperatively, she progressed well, achieving full fracture healing by 9 months with minimal pain and functional independence. She declined further surgical intervention for hardware removal or ankle fusion, reporting satisfaction with her outcome.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the successful use of tibiotalar nailing as a viable alternative to ORIF and TTC nailing for managing geriatric pilon fractures with significant comorbidities. By preserving subtalar joint function, this approach offers potential advantages in mobility and quality of life while mitigating the risks associated with more invasive procedures. Given the limited existing literature on this technique, this report contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting its use. Further studies are warranted to compare tibiotalar nailing with conventional approaches in larger cohorts to refine its indications and optimize patient outcomes.

Copyright: ยฉ Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.



๐Ÿ“š ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ (References)

  1. Monticone Marco, Ambrosini Emilia, Brunati Roberto, Capone Antonio, Pagliari Giulia et al.. How balance task-specific training contributes to improving physical function in older subjects undergoing rehabilitation following hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical rehabilitation 32(3), 2018. ยท DOI: 10.1177/0269215517724851 ยท PubMed: 28805094
  2. Costescu Elena Puin, Dronic Aliona, Alexa Loana Dana, Alexa O. COMPLEX MANAGEMENT OF FRAILTY FRACTURES--CASE REPORT. Revista medico-chirurgicala a Societatii de Medici si Naturalisti din Iasi 120(1), 2016. ยท PubMed: 27125080
  3. Sayed Bassel El, Young Porter. Tibiotalar Nailing for Geriatric Pilon Fractures: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Journal of orthopaedic case reports 15(9), 2025. ยท DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i09.6046 ยท PubMed: 40936864
๋ณธ ํฌ์ŠคํŠธ๋Š” PubMed ๊ณต๊ฐœ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ์ž๋™ ์ƒ์„ฑ๋˜์—ˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค. ์ž„์ƒ ์ ์šฉ ์ „ ๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œ ์›๋ฌธ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ณ  ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ€์™€ ์ƒ๋‹ดํ•˜์„ธ์š”.

ๅ‡บๅ…ธ